Thursday, May 09, 2024
54.0°F

Compromise offered on nonmotorized river plan

by Matt Baldwin / Whitefish Pilot
| June 11, 2014 10:15 PM

Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks is proposing a compromise that allows motorized boats continued access to the Whitefish River — at least part of the year. In its recommendation to the state Fish and Wildlife Commission, FWP says a seasonal closure to motorboats from July 5 to Sept. 30 is a better alternative than the year-round nonmotorized restriction brought forth by the city of Whitefish.

The commission will consider the matter at their June 12 meeting in Helena.

The city passed a resolution in November that proposes to restrict the Whitefish River to electric motors or manually powered vessels from the BNSF train trestle to the JP Road bridge. A no-wake restriction on the stretch of river has been in place since 1989.

The city argues a nonmotorized waterway will help address resource damage and safety issues. They also say its in alignment with the social desires of the community to create a unique place for nonmotorized recreation — such as paddleboarding, kayaking, canoeing — away from Whitefish Lake.

Local FWP officials took public comment on the nonmotorized proposal at an April meeting where 36 people spoke in favor of the project, with six speaking in opposition. They also received 168 written comments with 69 in support and 99 against.

In their recommendation, FWP says the current no-wake rule limits resource damage, keeps the river safe, maintains the historic use of motorized boats, and provides a good alternative for nonmotorized and small vessels.

“However, given the split in public comment and support for the proposed restriction, FWP feels a seasonal closure...is a better alternative,” FWP notes.

“This addresses public comment by allowing anglers the opportunity to fish in the spring, residents can boat upstream to watch the fireworks on July 4, waterfowl hunters can motor back upstream in the fall while at the same time providing the warm summer months for nonmotorized / electric motor use when the majority of people engage in these activities.”

The FWP goes on to note there are three spots along the river where motorboats have difficulty traveling upstream while also maintaining a no-wake speed. They are suggesting motorboats be allowed to travel at the “minimum operating speed necessary to progress up stream.”

A similar rule is in place along the Swan River.

FWP is asking the commission to extend public comment to further analyze the proposed seasonal closure.