Nuclear energy to fight warming

The escalating dispute on the effects of global warming is a topic of conversation in today's everyday life. An attempt to produce clean, carbon-free energy involves such sources as hydroelectric, geothermal, wind turbines and photovoltaic systems. The switch from carbon-based energy sources is recognized as one of the chief goals of governments throughout the world.

Should we be considering nuclear energy once again after a 20-year period when nuclear plant starts has fallen to zero? France produces 80 percent of its energy from nuclear reactors, while in the U.S., this sources amounts to only 20 percent. France has the cleanest air in all of Europe, and they also have perfected a more efficient method of disposing of radioactive waste.

The need for alternative fuels for our cars will continue to be imperative, but to provide energy for our towns and cites should include an examination of the feasibility of nuclear power production. Americans might take a long look and decide that nuclear generated power is the only solution to receding glaciers and global warming.

To borrow a phrase from the introduction to the Whitefish Growth Policy now being finalized, "There is little purpose in producing a community plan that relies on the continued and escalating use of fossil fuels and that fails to take into account the impact that greenhouse gases are having on the planet."

George Gardner is a designer who lives in Whitefish.